JD.com Stock Polarizes Investors Amid Short Selling, Regulatory Hurdles, and AI Push

JD.com Stock Polarizes Investors Amid Short Selling, Regulatory Hurdles, and AI Push

As of November 2025, JD.com Inc. is caught in a financial tug-of-war: while short sellers are betting heavily against its stock, analysts and rating agencies see a company quietly building long-term value beneath the noise. The Beijing-based e-commerce giant, once a poster child for China’s digital boom, now trades at $29.06 — a far cry from its highs, but with a startling disconnect between market perception and fundamental analysis. The twist? Nearly half of all its shares are moving in the shadows.

Dark Pools and Short Sellers: The Hidden Battle

Here’s the thing: what you see on your trading app isn’t the whole story. According to MarketBeat, 42.41% of JD.com’s daily trading volume in November 2025 happened off-exchange in dark pools — private venues where hedge funds and institutional players execute large trades without revealing their orders to the public. That’s more than double the average for major U.S. tech stocks. And the short-selling pressure? It’s real. Fintel data shows 25.7 million shares sold short, requiring over two full trading days to cover at average volume. The short ratio peaked near 43%, meaning nearly half of all tradable shares were borrowed and sold in anticipation of a drop.

But here’s the odd part: nobody’s panicking on Wall Street. Despite the bearish signals, the analyst consensus remains a Moderate Buy. Ten analysts say “Buy,” two say “Strong Buy,” and only one — Wall Street Zen — issued a “Sell” in November 2025. Citigroup still sees $42 in value. Nomura, even after trimming its target, stands at $37. Both are well above the current price. So why the disconnect? Because the market is split between two narratives: one sees a logistics titan with AI ambitions; the other sees a company bleeding cash on food delivery and choking on regulation.

S&P’s Vote of Confidence: A Positive Outlook Amid Pressure

On April 14, 2025, S&P Global Ratings did something unexpected: they upgraded JD.com’s outlook from stable to positive, while keeping its long-term credit rating at A-. That’s not a small gesture. It means S&P believes JD.com’s ability to generate cash — even amid heavy spending — is improving. Their forecast? Mid-single digit revenue and EBITDA growth for 2025, slightly outpacing China’s overall GDP. How? By shifting away from electronics-heavy sales and betting on home goods, groceries, and, crucially, JD Logistics.

That last point matters. JD Logistics isn’t just a delivery arm — it’s the company’s future. S&P expects it to contribute more to profits over the next 12–24 months. And JD.com is willing to spend to make it happen: annual capital expenditures are projected at RMB20–22 billion through 2026. So are acquisitions. And dividends. And buybacks — another RMB20–22 billion slated for repurchases. Yet despite spending nearly RMB7.6 billion on debt maturities in 2025, S&P still expects JD.com to remain in a net cash position. That’s rare for a company burning so much capital.

The Valuation Paradox: Undervalued or Just Dying?

The Valuation Paradox: Undervalued or Just Dying?

Enter Simply Wall St. Their DCF model, updated in 2025, says JD.com is 46.1% undervalued. The math? An intrinsic value of $54.09 per share versus the $29.06 trading price. The company scores 5 out of 6 on valuation metrics. Its P/E ratio? Just 9.1x — a fraction of the 23.5x “fair” ratio. That’s either a bargain or a trap. And that’s the core of the debate.

One camp — the bulls — points to user growth, logistics dominance, and AI investments funded by a potential JD Logistics IPO. They argue that if logistics becomes a standalone profit center, fair value could hit $60. The bears? They see a company stretched thin: net margins projected at just 1.9% in 2025, food delivery investments draining cash, and regulatory roadblocks — including the halted stablecoin project — choking innovation. U.S.-China trade tensions, S&P noted, could further dent consumer confidence.

What’s Next? The Logistics IPO and the AI Gamble

JD.com’s next move could define its next decade. The planned JD Logistics IPO isn’t just about raising money — it’s about unlocking value. If successful, it could fund AI-driven warehouse automation, last-mile delivery drones, and predictive inventory systems that could cut costs by 15–20%. But timing is everything. China’s retail sector is more competitive than ever, with Alibaba and Pinduoduo pushing hard on price and speed. And consumer trust? It’s fragile. A 14.8% stock slide in 2025 didn’t happen in a vacuum.

There’s also the cash flow tightrope. With RMB2.6 billion in working capital inflow expected for 2025, and RMB11–12 billion going to dividends, JD.com is walking a fine line between rewarding shareholders and reinvesting. The company’s ability to stay in the black while spending billions on AI and logistics will be the real test — not the quarterly earnings report.

Behind the Numbers: The Human Story

Behind the Numbers: The Human Story

What no model captures is the human cost. Thousands of warehouse workers in Anhui and Jiangsu are being trained to operate AI-guided sorting systems. Delivery drivers are switching from gasoline scooters to electric fleets — a move tied to Beijing’s green mandates. And in Shanghai, product managers are scrambling to adapt to new rules around data collection and financial services. JD.com isn’t just a stock ticker. It’s a microcosm of China’s economic transition: trying to innovate under pressure, balancing growth with control, and betting big on infrastructure no one else is willing to fund.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is so much of JD.com’s trading happening in dark pools?

Dark pool trading accounts for 42.41% of JD.com’s volume as of November 2025, far above industry norms. This typically signals large institutional players — like hedge funds or sovereign wealth funds — executing sizable trades without moving the market price. It’s not illegal, but it reduces transparency, which can amplify volatility when those trades eventually surface. The high percentage suggests insiders or major investors are either accumulating or offloading positions quietly, adding to the uncertainty around true demand.

How does S&P Global Ratings justify a positive outlook despite low margins?

S&P focuses on cash flow sustainability, not just profitability. JD.com is expected to generate RMB2.6 billion in working capital inflow in 2025 and remain net cash positive despite RMB20–22 billion in annual capex. The company’s shift toward higher-margin categories like home goods and JD Logistics, combined with its low debt burden and strong balance sheet, gives S&P confidence that margins will rebound in 2026 — even if 2025 looks thin.

What’s the risk of JD.com’s logistics IPO failing?

A failed IPO could force JD.com to fund AI and logistics expansion through debt, potentially raising its leverage ratio and triggering credit rating reviews. Investors might also interpret the delay as a sign of weak market appetite for logistics assets, which could further depress the parent company’s valuation. With competition from Alibaba’s Cainiao and state-backed logistics networks, timing and pricing are critical — and the current macro climate isn’t ideal.

Why is Simply Wall St’s valuation so different from the market price?

Simply Wall St’s $54.09 intrinsic value is based on long-term cash flow projections assuming JD Logistics becomes profitable and AI reduces operational costs. The market, however, is pricing in near-term risks: regulatory crackdowns, margin compression, and slowing consumer spending. The gap reflects a classic disconnect between growth investors (who see future value) and value investors (who fear execution risk). Until JD.com reports clearer profit signals from logistics and AI, the market will likely remain skeptical.

How do U.S.-China trade tensions affect JD.com’s stock?

While JD.com is primarily a China-focused retailer, U.S.-China tensions impact its access to global capital markets and investor sentiment. U.S. investors have been pulling back from Chinese tech stocks since 2021, and any escalation — like delisting threats or sanctions on logistics tech — could trigger further outflows. S&P notes that consumer confidence in China’s digital economy is already fragile; trade friction adds another layer of uncertainty that dampens growth expectations.

Is JD.com’s dividend sustainable given its spending?

Yes — for now. JD.com is paying out RMB11–12 billion annually in dividends, funded by strong operating cash flow and its net cash position. S&P expects this to continue through 2026, even with RMB20+ billion in capex, because the company isn’t relying on debt to pay shareholders. However, if logistics growth stalls or margins don’t improve in 2026, dividend cuts could become a possibility — making the current payout a key signal to watch.